Qualification test planner
Build a reliability qualification plan for your product grade and package: which stress tests apply, lots, sample sizes, conditions, durations, devices and schedule.
ReliabilityFor membersHow it worksSourcesWhere it helps
Register or sign in to use this tool
The working tool, its inputs and its results are for registered members. Registration is free and takes a minute. You come back to this page afterwards.
How it works
A qualification plan says which stress tests a product must pass before it ships, on how many lots and parts, under which conditions and for how long. This planner proposes the tests for your product's grade, package and features, lets you edit every row, and totals the parts, the lab weeks, the schedule and the cost.
- Choose the product category. Automotive parts follow the AEC-Q100 method and its temperature grades; commercial and industrial parts follow the JESD47 method. The grade sets the stress temperatures, for example the HTOL ambient and the temperature cycling range.
- Describe the package and features. The package decides the package integrity tests (wire bond shear and pull, solder ball shear, solderability) and whether moisture preconditioning comes first. Embedded non-volatile memory adds endurance and retention; a part that dissipates 1 W or more adds power temperature cycling.
- Use family data where it applies. A derivative, a package change or a die shrink can rely on data from a qualified family. The planner drops the die stresses for a package-only change and the package stresses for a die-only change, and marks where family data may reduce the lots; the justification is yours to record.
- Count the parts. Each row needs lots times parts per lot. The main stresses use three lots of 77 parts with zero failures: 231 parts without a failure show, at 90% confidence, that fewer than 1% of parts would fail that stress.
parts = sum over tests of (lots x parts per lot) - Build the schedule. Each test takes its stress time in weeks (168 hours a week, cycling at about two cycles an hour) plus a week for set-up and readouts. A test that follows another starts when that one ends; the rest start when the test boards are ready. The schedule is the longest chain.
weeks = ceiling(stress hours / 168) + 1; schedule = board weeks + longest chain of weeks - Track it. Each row carries a status (planned, running, passed, failed). A failure needs failure analysis and corrective action before the plan goes on.
Assumptions
- The proposed conditions are a Hub template written from the published methods as commonly applied; check every row against the revision of the standard you qualify to.
- Zero failures are allowed on every stress unless you change the row.
- Stresses after preconditioning start when preconditioning ends; tests without a predecessor run in parallel once the boards are ready.
- Costs come from your own figures: a cost per row, or a cost per device hour for the timed stresses.
Limits and warnings
- Not the standard itself: tables, options and exceptions in AEC-Q100 and JESD47 are not reproduced here.
- Product-specific tests (EMC, soft error rate, short circuit, gate leakage, defect screening) are left for you to add as rows.
- Lab capacity and chamber sharing are not modelled; the schedule assumes chambers are free.
- Family qualification rules vary by customer; agree the reuse with the customer before relying on it.
Sources
The methods and default figures rest on these public sources. The wording here is our own; read the source for its full text.
- AEC-Q100, Failure Mechanism Based Stress Test Qualification for Integrated Circuits, Revision J, Automotive Electronics Council, current revision, checked October 2026. The automotive method and its temperature grades; cited by name only.
- JESD47, Stress-Test-Driven Qualification of Integrated Circuits (opens in a new tab), JEDEC, revision M, August 2025. The method for commercial and industrial parts; cited by name only.
- Automotive Electronics Reliability Testing Starts and Ends with the Mission Profile (opens in a new tab), Power Electronics News (Thomas Eikenberg, Monolithic Power Systems), 14 May 2021. Why the plan should be checked against the product's mission profile (see the mission profile builder).
- Fundamentals of AEC-Q100 (webinar slides) (opens in a new tab), Monolithic Power Systems, 6 November 2018. An overview of the test groups and sample sizes.
Where it helps
The lifecycle stages this tool serves: 24 stages in 20 lifecycles.
- SoC lifecycle
- Hard IP lifecycle
- AMS lifecycle
- Chiplet lifecycle
- Automotive lifecycle
- AI accelerator lifecycle
- Process node lifecycle
- Startup lifecycle
- Power and compound lifecycle
- Memory lifecycle
- Space lifecycle
- Photonics lifecycle
- Fab build lifecycle
- MEMS and sensors lifecycle
- RF lifecycle
- Package technology lifecycle
- APQP lifecycle
- FPGA chip lifecycle
- Structured ASIC lifecycle
- Product lifecycle
More reliability tools
- Failure rate (FIT) calculator
- Stress test acceleration factor calculator
- Defect level (DPPM) estimator
- Error rate confidence calculator
- Lot sampling plan calculator
- Stack and multi-die yield calculator
- Radiation dose margin calculator
- Single-event upset rate estimator
- Component derating checker
- Mission profile builder
- Warpage and thermal mismatch estimator
Terms on this page
- Product qualification
- The planned set of stress tests and evaluations showing that a part, built on its production process and package, will be reliable in its intended use.
- AEC-Q100
- The qualification specification that defines the stress tests, temperature grades and sample requirements an integrated circuit must pass to be sold as automotive grade.
- JESD47
- The JEDEC standard that defines the set of stress tests, sample sizes and acceptance criteria required to qualify a commercial integrated circuit for production.
- HTOL
- The core reliability stress in which parts run with dynamic stimulus at elevated temperature and often elevated voltage, usually 1000 hours at 125 °C, to accelerate intrinsic wear-out and generate...
- Temperature cycling
- Repeated cycling of a device between hot and cold extremes in air, for example minus 55 to 125 °C, to accelerate fatigue at interfaces caused by thermal expansion mismatch.
- Wire bonding
- Connecting die bond pads to package leads or substrate fingers with fine gold, copper or aluminium wire, formed loop by loop using heat, ultrasonic energy and force.
- Solder ball
- The spherical solder interconnect attached to the underside of a BGA or CSP that forms the second level joint to the printed circuit board.
- Endurance
- How much data a storage device can absorb before its flash wears out, expressed as drive writes per day or total bytes written over the warranty term.
- Power cycling
- A reliability test in which a module is repeatedly self-heated by load current and cooled, producing large junction temperature swings.
- Die
- A single rectangular block of processed silicon cut from a finished wafer, carrying one complete circuit.
- Lot
- The unit of material movement in a fab: a group of wafers, conventionally up to 25, that travel together through the process flow and share a lot number, run card and dispatch priority.
- Failure analysis
- The disciplined investigation of a failed device, moving from non-destructive checks and electrical characterisation through fault localisation to physical inspection, in order to identify the fail...
Tell us what you're after and leave your email: we'll connect you with the right person on the Hub.