Transmission line impedance calculator
Work out the impedance, delay and loss of microstrip, stripline and coplanar lines from trace geometry and the dielectric, with differential pairs.
Analog, RF, photonics and packagingFree to useHow it worksSourcesWhere it helps
Fills the inputs below with typical figures. Replace any of them with your own.
- Characteristic impedance
- 50.71 Ω
- Effective dielectric constant
- 3.116
- 3.119 at 5 GHz (dispersion)
- Propagation delay
- 5.891 ps per mm
- 149.6 ps per inch, 589.1 ps over 100 mm. Signal speed 56.6% of light
- Total loss
- 0.537 dB per inch
- 0.211 dB per cm. Conductor 0.176, dielectric 0.361 dB per inch
- Loss over 100 mm
- 2.11 dB
- At 5 GHz. Electrical length 1,060 degrees
- Skin effect
- 0.935 µm skin depth
- Surface resistance 30.3 mohm per square, roughness factor 1.64. DC resistance 0.0357 Ω per inch
- Width for the target
- 0.359 mm
- Gives 50 Ω with the other dimensions as entered
Show the data as a table
| Trace width (mm) | Impedance (Ω) |
|---|---|
| 0.105 | 85.7 |
| 0.12 | 81.9 |
| 0.137 | 78.1 |
| 0.156 | 74.2 |
| 0.178 | 70.3 |
| 0.204 | 66.4 |
| 0.233 | 62.5 |
| 0.265 | 58.6 |
| 0.303 | 54.8 |
| 0.346 | 51 |
| 0.395 | 47.4 |
| 0.451 | 43.8 |
| 0.515 | 40.4 |
| 0.588 | 37.1 |
| 0.671 | 34 |
| 0.766 | 31 |
| 0.875 | 28.2 |
- Total (solid line, circles)
- Conductor (dashed line, squares)
- Dielectric (dotted line, triangles)
Show the data as a table
| Frequency (GHz) | Total | Conductor | Dielectric |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.1 | 0.0226 | 0.0154 | 0.00722 |
| 0.5 | 0.0733 | 0.0372 | 0.0361 |
| 1 | 0.129 | 0.0572 | 0.0722 |
| 2.5 | 0.289 | 0.108 | 0.181 |
| 5 | 0.537 | 0.176 | 0.361 |
| 10 | 0.995 | 0.273 | 0.722 |
| 20 | 1.85 | 0.406 | 1.44 |
| 28 | 2.51 | 0.487 | 2.02 |
| 40 | 3.48 | 0.589 | 2.89 |
Sign in to save your inputs and come back to them later.
| Frequency (GHz) | Effective dielectric constant | Delay (ps per inch) | Conductor (dB per inch) | Dielectric (dB per inch) | Total (dB per inch) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.1 | 3.116 | 149.6 | 0.0154 | 0.00722 | 0.0226 |
| 0.5 | 3.116 | 149.6 | 0.0372 | 0.0361 | 0.0733 |
| 1 | 3.117 | 149.6 | 0.0572 | 0.0722 | 0.129 |
| 2.5 | 3.117 | 149.6 | 0.108 | 0.181 | 0.289 |
| 5 | 3.119 | 149.6 | 0.176 | 0.361 | 0.537 |
| 10 | 3.126 | 149.8 | 0.273 | 0.722 | 0.995 |
| 20 | 3.153 | 150.4 | 0.406 | 1.44 | 1.85 |
| 28 | 3.185 | 151.2 | 0.487 | 2.02 | 2.51 |
| 40 | 3.249 | 152.7 | 0.589 | 2.89 | 3.48 |
| Width (mm) | Impedance (Ω) |
|---|---|
| 0.105 | 85.68 |
| 0.1199 | 81.91 |
| 0.1369 | 78.08 |
| 0.1563 | 74.21 |
| 0.1784 | 70.3 |
| 0.2037 | 66.39 |
| 0.2325 | 62.48 |
| 0.2655 | 58.61 |
| 0.3031 | 54.78 |
| 0.3461 | 51.03 |
| 0.3951 | 47.36 |
| 0.4511 | 43.81 |
| 0.515 | 40.38 |
| 0.588 | 37.1 |
| 0.6713 | 33.97 |
| 0.7664 | 31 |
| 0.875 | 28.21 |
How it works
A PCB or package trace behaves as a transmission line once it is a sizeable part of a wavelength. Its impedance sets reflections, its effective dielectric constant sets delay, and its conductor and dielectric loss set the insertion loss. This calculator takes the trace geometry, the dielectric and the frequency, gives all of these, and solves for the width that hits a target impedance.
- Microstrip impedance and effective permittivity. Hammerstad and Jensen's closed form gives the air-filled impedance Z01 from the width-to-height ratio u = W/h, and the effective permittivity from a blend of the dielectric constant and air. A strip thickness correction widens the strip slightly. The impedance is Z01 over the square root of the effective permittivity.
Z01(u) = 60 ln( f(u)/u + sqrt(1 + (2/u)^2) ) ohm, f(u) = 6 + (2 pi − 6) exp( −(30.666/u)^0.7528 ); e_eff = (er + 1)/2 + (er − 1)/2 x (1 + 10/u)^(−a b); Z0 = Z01 / sqrt(e_eff) - Embedded microstrip. A cover of dielectric above the trace pulls the field into the dielectric. The effective permittivity moves from the surface value to the dielectric constant as the cover grows past about the dielectric height, and the impedance follows it. The blend was checked against field solutions.
e_eff,cov = e_eff x exp(−2 c/h) + er x (1 − exp(−2 c/h)); Z0 = Z0,surface x sqrt(e_eff / e_eff,cov), with cover thickness c - Stripline. For a trace centred between two planes b apart, Cohn's exact solution for a thin strip uses the ratio of complete elliptic integrals, found here by the arithmetic-geometric mean. A finite thickness adds an effective width, taken from a table fitted to field solutions of rectangular traces. For an offset trace the two single-sided striplines are put in parallel and a small correction fitted to a field solution is applied.
Z0 = (30 pi / sqrt(er)) x K'(k)/K(k), k = tanh( pi We / (2 b) ), We = W + extra width for thickness, b = 2 h + t; offset: Z0 = 2 Za Zb / (Za + Zb) x (1 − 0.18 g^2), g = |h1 − h2| / (h1 + h2) - Coplanar waveguide with a ground plane. Conformal mapping gives the impedance and effective permittivity of a centre strip with coplanar grounds over a substrate backed by a plane. The copper thickness narrows the gap by about its own thickness and lowers the effective permittivity, because the side walls hold air; both corrections are fitted to field solutions.
k = a/b, k3 = tanh(pi a / 2h) / tanh(pi b / 2h), a = W/2, b = W/2 + gap; q = K'(k)K(k3) / (K(k)K'(k3)); e_eff = (1 + er q)/(1 + q); Z0 = 60 pi / (sqrt(e_eff) x (K(k)/K'(k) + K(k3)/K'(k3))) - Differential pairs. For edge-coupled microstrip the odd-mode impedance comes from the coupling capacitances of Garg and Bahl (parallel plate, fringing and gap terms), and the even-mode impedance is estimated as twice the single-ended value minus the odd value. For edge-coupled stripline Cohn's even and odd mode solutions are used with the effective width and a spacing narrowed by the thickness. The differential impedance is twice the odd-mode impedance.
microstrip: Zodd = 1 / (c sqrt(C_odd x C_odd,air)), C_odd = Cp + Cf + Cga + Cgd; Zeven = 2 Z0 − Zodd; stripline: ke = tanh(pi We/2b) tanh(pi (We + s)/2b), ko = tanh(pi We/2b) / tanh(pi (We + s)/2b); Zdiff = 2 Zodd - Delay. The propagation delay per unit length depends on the effective permittivity at the frequency. For microstrip the permittivity rises with frequency by Hammerstad and Jensen's dispersion model; the other structures use their static value.
delay per metre = sqrt(e_eff) / c; e_eff(f) = er − (er − e_eff) / (1 + G (f/fp)^2), fp = Z0 / (2 mu0 h) - Conductor loss. Wheeler's incremental inductance rule turns the impedance model into a loss: the series resistance is the surface resistance divided by the free-space impedance, times the rise in the air-line impedance when every conductor surface moves back into the metal by a small step d. Roughness multiplies the surface resistance by the Hammerstad and Jensen factor.
Rs = sqrt(pi f mu0 / sigma) x Kr; Kr = 1 + (2/pi) arctan(1.4 (Delta/skin depth)^2); R = (Rs / 377) x dZair/dd; alpha_c = R / (2 Z0) Np/m; dB = 8.686 x Np - Dielectric loss and total. Dielectric loss follows the loss tangent and the share of the field in the dielectric. The total loss is the two added, times the length.
alpha_d = (pi f tan d / c) x (er / sqrt(e_eff)) x (e_eff − 1)/(er − 1) Np/m; loss (dB) = 8.686 x (alpha_c + alpha_d) x length - Width for a target impedance. Impedance falls as the trace widens, so the width for a target is found by bisection between a very narrow and a very wide trace with the other dimensions held. A pair is solved for its differential impedance at the spacing entered.
find W such that Z(W) = target, by halving the bracket 80 times
Assumptions
- The dielectric is homogeneous with a single dielectric constant and loss tangent, both taken at the frequency of interest. Real laminates change with frequency and with the resin and glass weave; use the supplier's value at your frequency.
- Impedance is quasi-static. Only microstrip includes a dispersion correction; delay for the other structures is its static value.
- Conductors are copper-like with the conductivity entered (58 MS/m for copper), and planes are wide enough to be infinite. The solder mask is ignored unless the structure is the embedded one.
- A differential pair is symmetric and edge-coupled, with equal traces; the loss and delay shown use the odd (differential) mode for stripline and the single-trace permittivity for microstrip.
- The thickness corrections for stripline and coplanar waveguide, the offset stripline factor and the microstrip pair formulas were checked and fitted against finite-difference field solutions made for this tool (agreement in the limits below). Defaults for FR-4, build-up film and laminates are editorial estimates; replace them with a supplier figure.
Limits and warnings
- Quoted accuracy: microstrip impedance within about 1% for width over height of 0.1 to 100 and a dielectric constant of 1 to 128, and effective permittivity within about 0.2% (Hammerstad and Jensen). Symmetric stripline within about 1 to 2% for trace thickness up to a fifth of the plane spacing. Coplanar waveguide within about 2%. Embedded microstrip impedance within about 1.5% and its delay within about 3%. Offset stripline and the microstrip pair within about 3 to 4%; the even mode of a microstrip pair is rougher.
- Conductor loss from the incremental inductance rule is an estimate good to roughly 10 to 20% above the frequency where the skin depth is well under the copper thickness. Surface treatments, plating and etch trapezoids are not modelled.
- The trapezoidal cross-section of an etched trace is not modelled; measure the top and bottom width and enter their mean. Solder mask, glass weave skew, via stubs and discontinuities are not included.
- Broadside-coupled pairs, pairs of unequal width, and structures with more than two planes need a field solver.
Sources
The methods and default figures rest on these public sources. The wording here is our own; read the source for its full text.
- Accurate Models for Microstrip Computer-Aided Design (opens in a new tab), E. Hammerstad and O. Jensen, IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest, pp. 407 to 409, May 1980. Microstrip impedance, effective permittivity, thickness correction, dispersion and the roughness factor.
- Shielded Coupled-Strip Transmission Line, S. B. Cohn, IRE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. MTT-3, pp. 29 to 38, October 1955. Even and odd mode impedances of edge-coupled striplines, and the single stripline as the uncoupled limit.
- Microstrip Lines and Slotlines, K. C. Gupta, Ramesh Garg and I. J. Bahl, Artech House, 1979. Coupling capacitances of edge-coupled microstrip (Garg and Bahl) and the coplanar waveguide background.
- Formulas for the Skin Effect (opens in a new tab), H. A. Wheeler, Proceedings of the IRE, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 412 to 424, September 1942. The incremental inductance rule for conductor loss.
- Coplanar Waveguide Circuits, Components, and Systems (chapter 3, conductor-backed coplanar waveguide), Rainee N. Simons, Wiley-Interscience, 2001. Quasi-static conformal-mapping expressions for the impedance and effective permittivity of coplanar waveguide with a ground plane.
- Microwave Engineering, 4th edition (stripline conductor loss and microstrip design equations), David M. Pozar, John Wiley and Sons, 2012. Used as a cross-check: the stripline conductor attenuation and the microstrip width design equations.
- RO4350B Laminates data sheet (opens in a new tab), Rogers Corporation, 2024 revision. Relative permittivity 3.48 and dissipation factor 0.0037 at 10 GHz, used in the laminate preset.
Where it helps
The lifecycle stages this tool serves: 7 stages in 5 lifecycles.
More analog, rf, photonics and packaging tools
Method notev1Formula, ranges, sources and limits
Calculates the impedance, effective dielectric constant, delay and loss of microstrip, stripline and coplanar lines and differential pairs from their geometry, dielectric and frequency, and solves for the width that gives a target impedance.
Formula
Z01(u) = 60 ln( f(u)/u + sqrt(1 + (2/u)^2) ) ohm, f(u) = 6 + (2 pi − 6) exp( −(30.666/u)^0.7528 ); e_eff = (er + 1)/2 + (er − 1)/2 x (1 + 10/u)^(−a b); Z0 = Z01 / sqrt(e_eff); e_eff,cov = e_eff x exp(−2 c/h) + er x (1 − exp(−2 c/h)); Z0 = Z0,surface x sqrt(e_eff / e_eff,cov), with cover thickness c; Z0 = (30 pi / sqrt(er)) x K'(k)/K(k), k = tanh( pi We / (2 b) ), We = W + extra width for thickness, b = 2 h + t; offset: Z0 = 2 Za Zb / (Za + Zb) x (1 − 0.18 g^2), g = |h1 − h2| / (h1 + h2); k = a/b, k3 = tanh(pi a / 2h) / tanh(pi b / 2h), a = W/2, b = W/2 + gap; q = K'(k)K(k3) / (K(k)K'(k3)); e_eff = (1 + er q)/(1 + q); Z0 = 60 pi / (sqrt(e_eff) x (K(k)/K'(k) + K(k3)/K'(k3))); microstrip: Zodd = 1 / (c sqrt(C_odd x C_odd,air)), C_odd = Cp + Cf + Cga + Cgd; Zeven = 2 Z0 − Zodd; stripline: ke = tanh(pi We/2b) tanh(pi (We + s)/2b), ko = tanh(pi We/2b) / tanh(pi (We + s)/2b); Zdiff = 2 Zodd; delay per metre = sqrt(e_eff) / c; e_eff(f) = er − (er − e_eff) / (1 + G (f/fp)^2), fp = Z0 / (2 mu0 h); Rs = sqrt(pi f mu0 / sigma) x Kr; Kr = 1 + (2/pi) arctan(1.4 (Delta/skin depth)^2); R = (Rs / 377) x dZair/dd; alpha_c = R / (2 Z0) Np/m; dB = 8.686 x Np; alpha_d = (pi f tan d / c) x (er / sqrt(e_eff)) x (e_eff − 1)/(er − 1) Np/m; loss (dB) = 8.686 x (alpha_c + alpha_d) x length; find W such that Z(W) = target, by halving the bracket 80 times
| Input | Unit | Range it holds for | Comes from |
|---|---|---|---|
| Structure | choice | microstrip, embedded, stripline, offset-stripline, cpw, diff-microstrip, diff-stripline | Your figure |
| Dimension unit | choice | mm, mil, um | Your figure |
| Trace width | unit chosen | from 0.0001 | Your figure |
| Copper thickness | unit chosen | from 0.0001 | Your figure |
| Dielectric height to the plane | unit chosen | from 0.0001 | Your figure |
| Second dielectric height or cover | unit chosen | from 0.0001 | Your figure |
| Spacing between a pair | unit chosen | from 0.0001 | Your figure |
| Coplanar gap | unit chosen | from 0.0001 | Your figure |
| Relative permittivity | ratio | 1 to 20 | Your figure |
| Loss tangent | ratio | 0 to 0.1 | Your figure |
| Surface roughness, RMS | um | 0 to 5 | Your figure |
| Conductivity | MS/m | 1 to 100 | Your figure |
| Frequency | GHz | 0.001 to 100 | Your figure |
| Line length | unit chosen | from 0 | Your figure |
| Length unit | choice | mm, cm, in, m | Your figure |
| Target impedance | ohm | 5 to 400 | Your figure |
Outputs: Characteristic impedance of one trace (ohm); Differential impedance (ohm); Effective dielectric constant, static (ratio); Propagation delay at the frequency (ps per mm); Total loss (dB per inch); Width for the target impedance (unit chosen).
Assumptions
- The dielectric is homogeneous with a single dielectric constant and loss tangent, both taken at the frequency of interest. Real laminates change with frequency and with the resin and glass weave; use the supplier's value at your frequency.
- Impedance is quasi-static. Only microstrip includes a dispersion correction; delay for the other structures is its static value.
- Conductors are copper-like with the conductivity entered (58 MS/m for copper), and planes are wide enough to be infinite. The solder mask is ignored unless the structure is the embedded one.
- A differential pair is symmetric and edge-coupled, with equal traces; the loss and delay shown use the odd (differential) mode for stripline and the single-trace permittivity for microstrip.
- The thickness corrections for stripline and coplanar waveguide, the offset stripline factor and the microstrip pair formulas were checked and fitted against finite-difference field solutions made for this tool (agreement in the limits below). Defaults for FR-4, build-up film and laminates are editorial estimates; replace them with a supplier figure.
Uncertainty: Impedance is good to a few percent for the standard structures; loss to 10 to 20 percent. A field solver or a measurement of a test coupon is the check before releasing a controlled-impedance board.
Known limits
- Quoted accuracy: microstrip impedance within about 1% for width over height of 0.1 to 100 and a dielectric constant of 1 to 128, and effective permittivity within about 0.2% (Hammerstad and Jensen). Symmetric stripline within about 1 to 2% for trace thickness up to a fifth of the plane spacing. Coplanar waveguide within about 2%. Embedded microstrip impedance within about 1.5% and its delay within about 3%. Offset stripline and the microstrip pair within about 3 to 4%; the even mode of a microstrip pair is rougher.
- Conductor loss from the incremental inductance rule is an estimate good to roughly 10 to 20% above the frequency where the skin depth is well under the copper thickness. Surface treatments, plating and etch trapezoids are not modelled.
- The trapezoidal cross-section of an etched trace is not modelled; measure the top and bottom width and enter their mean. Solder mask, glass weave skew, via stubs and discontinuities are not included.
- Broadside-coupled pairs, pairs of unequal width, and structures with more than two planes need a field solver.
Where the method comes from
Follows Hammerstad and Jensen, Accurate models for microstrip computer-aided design (IEEE MTT-S, 1980) (opens in a new tab). The platform's version departs from it as follows.
- Conductor loss uses Wheeler's incremental inductance rule on the impedance model, with the Hammerstad and Jensen roughness factor. Why: One rule serves every structure in the tool and follows the thickness, spacing and plane distances.
- Stripline, offset stripline, coplanar waveguide and differential pairs use other published models (Cohn, Garg and Bahl, conformal mapping), with thickness terms fitted to field solutions. Why: Hammerstad and Jensen cover microstrip only.
Reference example, checked by test: Worked example in this method note: a 0.35 mm trace of 35 um copper on 0.2 mm of FR-4 (relative permittivity 4.3) from the Hammerstad and Jensen formulas, giving about 50.7 ohm and an effective permittivity of 3.12; the width for 50 ohm is 0.359 mm by bisection. Characteristic impedance of one trace 50.7091; Effective dielectric constant, static 3.11644; Width for the target impedance 0.35901.
Versions
- v1 (2026-10-25): First version, built from the tool idea.
Terms on this page
- PCB
- Printed circuit board (PCB): a laminated board of insulating layers and copper traces that carries and connects packaged chips and other components.
- Insertion loss
- The signal power lost by inserting a component such as a filter, switch or connector into a path, measured in decibels.
- Waveguide
- A patterned strip of high-index material, typically silicon or silicon nitride surrounded by oxide, that confines and guides light by total internal reflection.
- Launch-off-capture
- An at-speed timing test scheme in which the transition is launched by a functional capture clock pulse rather than by the last shift pulse.
Tell us what you're after and leave your email: we'll connect you with the right person on the Hub.