FMEA worksheet
Work through design or process failure modes, effects, causes and controls, rank them by risk number or an editable action priority rule, and track the actions to closure.
Quality worksheetsFor membersHow it worksSourcesWhere it helps
Register or sign in to use this tool
The working tool, its inputs and its results are for registered members. Registration is free and takes a minute. You come back to this page afterwards.
How it works
A failure mode and effects analysis lists how a design or a process could fail, what that would do, why it would happen, how the cause is prevented and how the failure would be found, then ranks the risks so the team acts on the worst first. This worksheet keeps the whole analysis as rows, ranks them by risk number or by your own action rules, and follows each action to closure.
- Choose design or process. A design FMEA looks at an item and its functions: the failure is the item not doing its function, and the controls are design rules, reviews, simulation and test. A process FMEA looks at a step: the failure is the step not delivering its requirement, and the controls are error-proofing, set-up, monitoring and inspection. The column names change with your choice; the maths does not.
- Rate severity, occurrence and detection. Severity (S) is how bad the effect is, from 1 (none) to 10 (harm without warning). Occurrence (O) is how likely the cause is, given the prevention control, from 1 (cannot happen) to 10 (expected). Detection (D) is how likely the controls are to find the cause or the failure before it reaches the next stage, from 1 (certain) to 10 (no chance). The one-line guides under the sheet describe each band in plain words; use your company's own scales where you have them.
- Rank with the risk number. The classical ranking multiplies the three ratings. The result runs from 1 to 1,000. The tool bands it with two thresholds you can change (200 and 100 by default, which are editorial). Two rows with the same number can be very different risks, for example 9 x 2 x 5 against 3 x 6 x 5, so look at severity first.
RPN = S x O x D; High if RPN is at or above the high threshold, Medium if at or above the medium threshold, else Low - Rank with severity-first action rules. Instead of multiplying, a rule set reads the three ratings in turn. Each rule says: if S is at least a value, and O is at least a value, and D is at least a value, the row is High (or Medium). A row takes the highest band among the rules that apply, and is Low when none does. The Hub default rule set puts severity first, so a severity of 9 or 10 is never Low. You can edit, add and remove rules. The AIAG and VDA FMEA handbook (first edition, 2019) defines its own action priority table; that table is not reproduced here. If your customer requires it, enter its rules as your own rows.
priority = highest band among the rules where S >= minimum S and O >= minimum O and D >= minimum D - Criticality. Severity times occurrence ignores detection and shows how bad and how likely a failure is before any inspection. It is shown for every row, and the matrix counts the rows in severity and occurrence bands. This is the idea behind the criticality ranking of FMECA in IEC 60812.
criticality = S x O - Follow the actions. Each action has an owner, a due date and a status. An action is overdue when its due date is before today and it is not done or marked not needed. When an action is done, the member enters the revised ratings, and the tool compares the risk number and the priority before and after.
overdue days = today − due date; reduction = RPN before − RPN after
Assumptions
- Ratings are whole numbers from 1 to 10; a row with a rating missing or outside that range is listed but left out of the counts.
- One cause per row: put each cause of a failure mode on its own row so that each gets its own rating and action.
- The rating guides and the default thresholds and rules are a Hub template in our own words, and are editorial. Replace them with the scales your company or customer requires.
- Revised ratings count only for actions marked done. Severity normally falls only when the design or product changes.
- Today's date is an input, so the overdue list is repeatable; use the button to fill in the current date.
Limits and warnings
- The tool does not reproduce the AIAG and VDA action priority table or the rating tables of any handbook or standard. Where your customer needs those, use the handbook and enter its rules or ratings as your own.
- The sheet is a single table, not the structure tree, function net and failure net of the seven-step method; it holds the same content in one row per cause.
- A risk number is a ranking aid, not a measured probability. Do not add risk numbers across rows or treat a fall in the total as a fall in real risk.
- A severity of 9 or 10 needs attention whatever the other ratings say; the tool warns when such a row has no action.
- Not a substitute for the standard or customer requirement that applies to your product (for example ISO 26262 for functional safety analysis).
Sources
The methods and default figures rest on these public sources. The wording here is our own; read the source for its full text.
- AIAG & VDA FMEA Handbook, first edition, Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG) and Verband der Automobilindustrie (VDA), June 2019. The seven-step method and the action priority approach; cited by name only, and its tables are not reproduced.
- IEC 60812:2018, Failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA and FMECA) (opens in a new tab), International Electrotechnical Commission, third edition, 10 August 2018. The generic method, criticality ranking and the alternative ways of calculating a risk number; cited by name only.
- Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) (opens in a new tab), ASQ (American Society for Quality), undated page, checked October 2026. A public overview: failures ranked by the seriousness of the effect, how often they happen and how easily they are detected.
Where it helps
The lifecycle stages this tool serves: 14 stages in 11 lifecycles.
More quality worksheets tools
- Control plan builder
- 8D problem solving report builder
- PPAP element checklist
- Requirements traceability matrix
- Product change impact checker
- Errata log builder
- Audit finding and action tracker
- Internal audit programme planner
- Interface agreement responsibility matrix
- IP deliverables checklist builder
- PDK release maturity checklist
Terms on this page
- FMEA
- A bottom-up, systematic review that lists how each part or function can fail, the local and system effects of each failure mode, and the existing controls.
- Design rule
- A geometric constraint a layout must meet to be manufacturable with good yield on a given process, such as minimum width, spacing, enclosure or density.
- AIAG
- Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG): a North American industry body that publishes the core quality tool manuals used by automotive suppliers, including APQP, PPAP, FMEA (jointly with VDA), MSA...
- VDA
- Verband der Automobilindustrie (VDA), the German Association of the Automotive Industry: it publishes quality standards widely used by automotive suppliers, such as the VDA 6.3 process audit and th...
- IEC
- The Geneva-based international standards organisation for electrical, electronic and related technologies, publishing everything from component symbols and safety requirements to functional safety...
- Failure mode
- The way in which a part or function fails, as seen from outside, such as an open, a short, a stuck output, a drift or a loss of function.
- ISO 26262
- The automotive functional safety standard that defines a safety lifecycle for electrical and electronic systems, assigning Automotive Safety Integrity Levels from A to D and prescribing the analysi...
- Functional safety
- The part of overall safety that depends on a system working correctly in response to its inputs, including detecting and handling its own faults.
Tell us what you're after and leave your email: we'll connect you with the right person on the Hub.