This thread is for discussing the lifecycle document "Retirement or replacement decision: gate review pack".
How to run the gate at which the owner decides to retire an AI-assisted step, replace it with another qualified option or restrict it to a narrower scope, with the reason and evidence recorded, a transition plan agreed with affected projects and the fallback or replacement flow ready. It is written for the design team manager who owns the decision, adoption programme management, CAD and flow engineering, licence management and quality.
Read the document: https://www.thesemiconhub.com/lifecycle/ai-assisted/gates/aa-retirement-decision/document
Point out anything that is wrong, unclear or missing, and say which section you mean. Reviewers read this thread when they audit the document.